Given all the talk lately of Threads, Mastodon, and ways that people can publish on their own sites, I thought it might be worth revisiting what the fediverse actually is — and why an organization might want to integrate with it. My focus is on media organizations, but remember that just
NotableLinks
A nice investigation into who actually hosts fediverse instances. I've been in a few situations where I've had to fend off a DDoS originating from Hetzner servers, and it's just now dawning on me: what if those weren't malicious attacks but were
NotableLinks
"Five dictionaries as well as eight encyclopedias and other reference materials including “The Guinness Book of World Records” and “Ripley’s Believe it or Not” are among over 1,600 books that Escambia County Public Schools removed from its library shelves in December and flagged for review." Alongside
I’ve spent much of my career telling organizations that they should publish in a space that they control, on their own domain name. My usual argument is that it shields you from major changes in company policy, or even from the platform you’re depending on from going out
NotableLinks
"So when we wonder where all the websites have gone, know it’s the curators we’re nostalgic for because the curators showed us the best the web had to offer once upon a time. And the curators— the tenders, aggregators, collectors, and connectors— can bring us back to
NotableLinks
It's feeling more and more like Substack will be toast if they don't significantly walk back their policy on Nazis. (And honestly, at this point, even if they did, who would want to be associated with it?) "This was never about the fate of a
NotableLinks
An in-depth writeup of Meta's fediverse meetup last year by Tom Coates, who was one of the roughly 20 people in attendance. Most of these details have been discussed and speculated on at this point, but it's good to read them in one place, and I
NotableLinks
I like this argument that generated content is an invasive species in our content ecosystem. "As generated material rapaciously populates the Internet, human-created artworks will be outcompeted by generated graphics on social media platforms by virtue of volume." I agree that this is something to be concerned with,
NotableLinks
"The tools that likely brought down Harvard president Claudine Gay are improperly used on students all the time. [...] The technology of text mining can be used to destroy the career of any scholar at any time." Tools like Turnitin are rife with false positives, and can be weaponized
NotableLinks
I think Chuck Tingle is awesome and proves love. This was a disappointing decision by the Texas Library Association, which is hopefully a learning moment for every organization like it. Chuck's description of the intersectional challenges at play here is in-depth and well-stated. And there's this
NotableLinks
This was why I started Known, and I wonder if I should try again. "If we want the future web we’re all clamouring for, we need to give people more options for self-hosted independence. If we seriously, truly want the independent, non-enshittified personal web to flourish, we need
NotableLinks
The headline here is a little misleading, because it should end: "... but not proactively, and with no changes to our content policy." Substack seems to want to have its cake and eat it: to offer content deals, promote writers, and shape its writer community, but also be treated
