Skip to main content
 

Watching tech democracy at work. It's amazing to see different interests (heatedly) debate with each other in a room.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

"Sorry, that license was written by lawyers." Schema.org seems to be directing us to disregard the license terms.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

"The licensing terms of schema.org encourages everyone to produce and consume data." Wording doesn't suggest that?

· Statuses · Share this post

 

If you're interested in Idno: http://idno.co Indieweb: http://indiewebcamp.com

· Statuses · Share this post

 

A pleasure to see Evan explain pump.io. Such a cool system.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

The Mozilla Social API is very exciting to me. Really a way for sites to add functionality to the browser (if the user wants it).

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Fun to see an site. More on that in a little bit ...

· Statuses · Share this post

 

I don't like taking statements like "we won't monetize your data" on trust. If you mean it, make it impossible & prove it.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

You can't say that you're on the side of openness and user rights if you assist interests that restrict openness and user rights.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Yeah! <a href="http://twitter.com/t">@t</a> calling Google out on their very restrictive license for <a href="http://schema.org">schema.org</a>.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

One notable absence from - where are the browser vendors?? (Mozilla aside - and kudos to them for being here.)

· Statuses · Share this post

 

@kevinmarks If only there was another format to represent textual information on the web.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Predictions of the death of Active Directory and LDAP. "Those are dinosaurs", to be replaced by rich profiles. Amen.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Roles fundamentally don't fit into my view of the world, but I grudgingly understand the need in traditional enterprise structures.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

@aaronpk Agree with you. HTTP 2.0 is about faster delivery, not pre-emptively sending you completely unrelated content.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

@jasnell That sounds like it's ripe for some terrible use cases. I don't want to passively receive; I want to actively retrieve.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

I absolutely do not want my devices to prefetch content that I haven't explicitly indicated I'm interested in subscribing to.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Interesting ideas from Telecom Italia about prefetching content based on your social interests using unused bandwidth.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Refreshing listening to <a href="http://twitter.com/ciberch">@ciberch</a> talking about Crushpath: very on-point examples, and sensible asks of the w3c.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

A lot of these enterprise topics also apply to institutions like universities, too. Worth talking across sectors.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

"We're asking 'is this social.' WHO CARES?" Exactly. What the hell. Build software that solves problems.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

"Collaboration is within a team; social is with people you don't know." But what a team even *is* is changing!

· Statuses · Share this post

 

Now discussing / arguing the difference between social and collaboration. I'd argue that both are elements of the other.

· Statuses · Share this post

 

I think the has a lot of potential to be the basis of that extensible set of standards. http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/papers/MVP.html

· Statuses · Share this post

 

So we need a simple, federated set of standards that can easily be extended & integrated across a variety of platforms.

· Statuses · Share this post