> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://werd.io/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Occupy Facebook: innovation in the era of social protest
- URL: https://werd.io/occupy-facebook-innovation-in-the-era-of-social-protest/
- Published: 2011-12-30T01:57:56.000Z
- Updated: 2025-06-12T11:00:44.000Z
- Author: Ben Werdmuller
- Tags: Politics, #ben-684a32da145d7d001be71dae, Web, Data control, data portability, decentralized social networks, decentralized social web, occupy, occupy wall street, social web, #ows, #Migrated-1749693130536, #wp, #wp-post, #Import 2025-06-11 21:52

[![Occupy UM](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7166/6472815289_7c4e78a5a8_m.jpg)](http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashakimel/6472815289/)

[](http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/occupy-facebook/)[Wired reports that a group involved in the Occupy movement is working on its own decentralized social networking platform:](http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/occupy-facebook/)

> “I don’t want to say we’re making our own Facebook. But, we’re making our own Facebook,” said Ed Knutson, a web and mobile app developer who joined a team of activist-geeks redesigning social networking for the era of global protest.

[Dave Winer notes that it probably won't succeed:](http://scripting.com/stories/2011/12/29/morningCoffeeNotes.html)

> *Internet*

In principle, I agree with Dave. It's a fundamental mistake that a lot of people make when they build a social site. I used to spend a fair amount of my time at Elgg dissuading people from trying to make the new MySpace (which was the hot thing at the time), and inevitably, none of the neo-MySpace generic social networking sites worked out. Where open social networking *did* work out was for specific use cases: connecting people inside charities, providing platforms for reflective learning in education, rallying around causes or products.

However, that's also an argument for why a social engine for Occupy might succeed. If it's geared specifically at the needs for protest, while using existing technologies and simple solutions where appropriate standards don't exist, it may become the first broadly-adopted decentralized social platform. From the backbone of Occupy using it, I can easily imagine other progressive organizations and individuals picking it up, eventually spreading through the academic sector - until it finally reaches the commercial world. Sure, there's no market for that, but there's a drive and motivation.

In an age where [laws like SOPA](http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921%5F3-57329001-281/how-sopa-would-affect-you-faq/) are considered - where the threat of sites being yanked off the Internet without due process is real - decentralization in platforms underpinning progressive causes makes a lot of sense. You can easily imagine the "retweet" or "reshare" feature found in the likes of Twitter or Tumblr being used to create a copy of information so that it spreads across the network like an old-school Usenet post; a kind of social multicast which ensures that nothing really dies. Some nodes may live in the cloud, some on dedicated server clusters, and others on always-on home computers linked via a Comcast router; the same free speech, everywhere, indelible and impossible to control.

That's a future I can get behind, and a platform I'd love to be involved with. In comparison, taking on Facebook just seems so small.

*[Occupy photo](http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashakimel/6472815289/) by [Sasha Y. Kimel](http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashakimel/), released under a [Creative Commons license](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en).*