@sarahdessen Absolutely terrifying. I'm so, so glad ...
@sarahdessen Absolutely terrifying. I'm so, so glad she's okay. And well done.
@sarahdessen Absolutely terrifying. I'm so, so glad she's okay. And well done.
@unreasonable Highly depends on situation. Often you will have support from legacy investors - and early investments are often in team.
@rchrd_h Seems legit. The AP will join you in a moment.
@karaem Yep! We're excited about it.
@econproph I agree. So here's the big thing that I think needs to happen: professors _must_ be empowered to buy their own tools.
@econproph Always going to be true - so the key is to make openness a side effect, and concentrate on building an awesome experience.
Indieweb
@econproph The #indieweb community has been great at creating an ecosystem. Working code over mailing lists and standards bodies.
@econproph Trick with that, from experience, is that trying to create a cross-tool standard up front is a black hole. Need 2 or 3 tools 1st.
I don't think institutions can or should, generally, build their own software. But educators must be a tighter part of the conversation.
Blackboard's software is terrible. Horrible architecture, terrible service, closed in every way possible. EdTech needs more open solutions.
The question for institutions: if they need software like Blackboard, who will build it, and why?
Institutions are - rightly - turning to open source solutions to escape from lock-in at high licensing cost. It's eating Blackboard's lunch.