The Technological Republic, in brief
In which a defense contractor lays its anti-democratic, pro-fascist ideology bare.
[Palantir]
Palantir CEO Alex Karp wrote a book last year called the Technological Republic, but perhaps because it didn’t have the impact he hoped, the company posted a tweet thread (and LinkedIn post, etc) that summarizes its core points. Which are, to be clear, an argument for hard-right nationalism — complete with remilitarization and implied cultural hierarchy — and fusing Silicon Valley with the national security state.
In Karp’s world, Silicon Valley innovators have an obligation to build weapons through a kind of moral debt to the country. He also wants to see Germany and Japan re-militarized, escalating tensions that will see his company make more money through those arms sales — particularly as his manifesto declares that AI weapons, exactly of the kind he happens to sell, are an inevitable future of military action.
He says we should be more tolerant of billionaires and scrutinize their private lives less, while being less tolerant of other cultures. He declares that no nation has advanced progressive values more than the US (a tough sell in itself), but then recites a litany of anti-progressive ideas. He takes time to defend Elon Musk by name.
He also furthers the idea that people who further progressive ideas are some kind of “elite”, instead of what they actually are: people from all slices of life, including working class unions, who want to have a more inclusive, more peaceful society.
Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins has a great Bluesky thread that lays out the issues plainly:
“Point 21 is the giveaway, some cultures produce "wonders," others are "regressive and harmful." Once you accept that hierarchy, you've quietly been given permission to apply different standards of verification to different actors. The form of verification stays, but the democratic function doesn’t.
This is what verification looks like once national identity sits above method. Rigorous when it's pointed at adversaries, conveniently absent when it's pointed at us. Symmetric, evidence-led investigation of allied conduct, exactly what Bellingcat does, becomes the thing the worldview can't tolerate”
In short, I find this offensive, often contradictory, and terrifying in equal measure. It makes clear that Palantir, its associates, and companies like it (Anduril, for example) are a threat to a democratic, peaceful, inclusive society. There’s no point in being cautious or pulling punches; it must be opposed.
[Link]
